Pier Trust Chair criticises Pier Trust Rebuild Group

This email went to HB Pier Trust members on 29th Jan:


Yours Views are Urgently Sort

Dear Member

This email is crucial to the future direction of the Herne Bay
Pier Trust. I earnestly ask you to respond, however briefly. For too
long the feedback to trustees has come from a vocal minority and now we
are seeking the views of the silent majority of members.

 
You may have seen on the front page of the HB Times
last week the headline “£7.50 a day!” The article outlined the contents
of the Collier Report which the Trust commissioned reluctantly because
we were committed to it by the decisions of previous trustees. However,
the article was right in many points. I feel the time has come for
trustees other than the rebuild group to speak out.
 
A  project as massive as a long pier needs a considerable period of
discussion and consultation before any decisions are fixed however fast
the rebuild group are pressing forwards a marina project. Since reading
the report carefully, several trustees, including myself, have serious
reservations about the marina being tacked onto the long pier to which
every trustee is committed. The long pier is the reason most of us
joined the Trust and we certainly never envisaged people paying to walk
onto their pier.
 
As a charitable Trust, we have a duty to act responsibly – first in the
interest of the members, yourselves, and secondly in the interests of
Herne Bay. The majority of trustees do not believe pursuing a marina
pier is in those best interests. A Herne Bay Marina somewhere else would
be brilliant we would fully support a group set up for this purpose.
 
We have appended belowere, undoctored, a summary of the
facts and figures, which appear in the Collier Report to support the
marina pier, for you to read and judge for yourselves.

Our reservations are as follows:

  1. The
    idea that 175,000 visitors will pay £7.50 and 30,000 residents paying
    £30 annually to walk on their own pier is unrealistic and it goes
    completely against the concept of a pier for the residents of Herne Bay.
     The profit from those projected entry fees, even after concessions,
    amount  to £3.8million  –  three times the profits projected for the
    marina (£1.1million) . I always imagined we would build  a free People’s
    Pier where residents can enjoy the sea views, have a coffee, read a
    paper, walk a dog, etc.  The cost proposed would make this the dearest
    pier in UK. (Southend £3.50, Cleveland £1.50) and the projected visitors
    are twice the number for Southend. 
     
  2. A
    car park at the pier head said to be “critical” to the success of the
    marina”(estimated at 200 cars a day @ £10) would completely change the
    ethos of a promenade type pier. There are no costings in the report for
    the two-lane road which would have to be built up the pier to reach the
    car park. 
     
  3. The
    potential fire hazard of fuelling ((fuelling profits in the report are
    projected at £45K a year) and 200 cars a mile out to sea is horrendous.
    Piers and fire have a horrible habit of being associated. 
     
  4. The
    report implies that the long pier is not viable without a marina. This
    cannot be so. We agree the long pier should have something spectacular
    to bring visitors into the town. A sea-centre with viewing tunnels has
    been just one suggestion. The report contains many useful facts about
    other attractions and funding sources we can consider and there are many
    creative people in HB with the imagination to come forward with
    alternative unique selling points for a long pier. We should like to tap
    into their ideas and hold an exhibition and debate in the summer into
    the ideas people like. This should be exciting and fun for all Herne Bay
    to be involved in. 
     
  5. When
    the Trust’s long pier aspirations were entrusted by the Board to a
    specific  trustee to form a rebuild team but always under the authority
    of the Board. But, since the AGM, the rebuild group which includes
    ex-trustees has become, in my opinion, a pressure group well working
    outside the remit of the Pier Trust Board – publishing articles in
    magazines we do not see, representing the Trust in the press, meeting
    Sir Roger Gale to discuss the marina project without our knowledge,
    commissioning stunning artists’ impressions which have appeared in the
    press and on the web. We need our members to know that the rebuild group
    and its marina project website, no longer reflect the views of the
    Herne Bay Pier Trust Board.
     
  6. In
    February 2012, the Board voted to support a gradual rebuild approach to
    the long pier – first establishing the short pier as a vibrant place
    and then finding funding to build on promenade and second platform and
    so on, each stage supporting the funding of the next.  Ideas for
    attractions such a sea-world centre with viewing bays, retro rides,
    restaurants, cafes, retail outlets for quality goods, entertainment
    platforms and function areas for weddings and performance were put
    forward.

Your
mandate is now vital to us as a Board.  Please take a little time to
read through the attached set of facts and figures supporting the marina
project. Then could you please email us back your views by the 28th
February 2013.  

 
1. Do you wish us to develop in stages a free pier without a
marina on the end – with attractions chosen in consultation with the
members and the people of HB?
 

2. Do you give the Board (with me in the chair) your mandate to take firm control of  the Trust’s rebuild group?

Doreen Stone
Chairman

Summary of facts and figures in the Collier Report 
 
The project has two key concepts :
Marina and Visitor attractions
with two hubs: The Pier Piazza and the Sea Pavilion
 
The estimated annual income comes from 3 sources: Marina, Visitors and Rents
 
Costs of project :

  1. Collier figures based on the Gifford Report

 
                                                                         Infrastructure   : £32.0m
                                                                         Marina             : £2.9m
                                                                         Project fees     : £3.2m
                                                                         Additional        : £1.0m
                                                                 Total for structure : £40.1million
 
This does not include a 2 lane vehicle access to parking for 200 cars at
the marina – regarded as “critical” to the success of the marina by the
Report
This does not include boat lifting for winter – also regarded as essential
 
2. Additional Costs from Collier                        Hotels             : £4.3
                                                                         Aquarium        : £3.8
                                                                         Restaurants    : £1.8
                                                                         Cinema           : £3.1 
                                                              Total for Pier Piazza: £13.3million
                                                                           Hotel/spa       : £6.3m
                                                                           Casino           : £1.3m
                                                                           Marina           : £0.4
                                                                           Boutiques      : £1.3
                                                       Total for Sea Pavilion      : £9.2 million
                                                                           Kiosks            :  £0.1m
                                                                           Water sports  : £0.4m
                                                                           Boat tours      : £0
                                                                           Cycle hire       : £0
                                                                           Play park        :  £0.3m
                                                                           Ticket offices  : £0.2.m
                                                                           Function pav  : £1.0m
                                                                           Other              : £1.0m
                                                 Total for Rented property      : £3.0million
 
Therefore total estimated costs = £66 million plus cost of 2-lane road, marina car park and boat lifting facility for winter. 
 
Annual Profits
3 sources profits : Marina, Visitors and Rents

  1. Marina

 
i) Annual berths
Projected annual charge : £300 per metre per boat (based on average 10
metre boat) cp Ramsgate £205, Gillingham £149 and Swale £148
 
275 annual berths at estimated likely 80% occupancy = 220 boats @ £3000 = £660,000                                       Total in Report : £528,000
 
ii) Visitors berths

estimated as 86 per day x 175 days  @ £15 per day
                                                                   Total in Report : £375, 000 

iii) Commercial berths                                Total income : £23,000
 
iv) Fuel sales                                                Total income :£ 45,000 

v) Landing charges
 estimated 99,000 annually @£2.0 ea                        Total :£ 165,000
 
                                                Total income from marina £ 1.1million
                                                                                         (to investors?)
 
2. Visitor Profits
 
i)Admission charges
Estimated 750,000 annual visitors @ £7.50 per adult Total : £4.5million
And  30,000 @ £30 annually                                       Total :  £0.8million
                                                     Total after concessions    : £3.8 million
 
 
ii) Other visitor profits
150 Functions @£2,500                                                   £0.4m
274 in playpark per day @ £5                                          £0.5m
Festival                                                                             £0.4m
Parking on marina – 200 per day @£10                           £0.6m
Fishing – 25 a day @£5                                                    £38,000
 
                                                                                        Total :  £2million
 
                                                         Total profits from visitors : £ 5.8million 

3. Annual Profits from Rentals

2 restaurants                                                   £4.3m
2 cinemas                                                       £16,250
1 casino                                                          £200,000
1 marina clubhouse                                        £60,000
10 boutiques                                                   £150,000
Kiosks                                                             £45,000
Watersports centre                                         £30,000
Boat ticket sales                                             £10,000
 
Hotels
Based on annual estimated turnover of:
120 budget rooms @£75 @68% occupancy = 81 rooms per night = £6075 per night          
70 rooms @£200 @ 62% occupancy = 43 rooms per night = £8600 per night
                                                       Total Rental profit : £810,000
Aquarium
Based on 200,000 visitors annually @£14 with concessions =annual turnover£1.6million 
                                                       Total Rent @ 12% = £196,000
 
Cycles – (100 day = £233,000 @rent 15% = profit in rental)
                                                           Total rent            £ 35,000
 
3 Adrenaline attractions 
(7,300 per year @£8 = £46,000)    Total rental @ 20% = £ 9,000
 
Gross profits summary

Profits

  1. marina            £1.1million
  2. rents               £2.1million
  3. visitors            £5.6million

                                                                   Total £8.8 million
 
Costs

Annual Salaries £800,000
Overheads £250,000
Depreciations £130,000                    
                                                                 Total £1.1 million

                                  Total profits after costs £7.7million                        
 
Staffing and employment opportunities (estimates)

Piazza: 72 :   Sea Pavilion 76;    Marina 29;    Other 34;   Festival time 3

                                              Total : 214 full/ pt time

The Pier Trust does some explaining

A response to Shaney’s letter from Pier Trust Chairman, Doreen Stone (11th Jan 2013)

Shaney and I met up yesterday to discuss her open letter about CCC’s possible leasing of the pier platform and I think she does have a cause for grievance that a concession of this magnitude was not advertised for tenders. We agreed with her that although anyone has a right to put in for planning permission on a site whether they own it or not, the opportunity to lease the platform should have been opened to everyone.

As Chairman of the Pier Trust, I assured her that at no point had the Pier Trust been involved or consulted about Mr Cain putting in for planning permission to build a mini golf course there. None of the trustees knew anything about it until we were told in late November, nine days before the AGM by Dawn Hudd who made it clear to me that CCC were under no obligation to consult the Trust as the Memorandum of Understanding had lapsed on June 30th 2012. At this meeting, we were given a single page artist’s concept sketch (which was not in the public domain at that time) to discuss with the Board.

The trustees’ first reaction was disappointment that it would prevent us implementing our own plans for a café, a community stage and an income from concessions on the platform including roller skating, markets and a weddings’ venue. However, as I am sure David Shepherd, our then Events Manager would confirm for me, during the summer the Trust met with so many problems including Health and Safety, stewarding, submission forms specific to each event to be submitted three months before the date of the event – that we were never able to run the farmers’ and other markets, the art weekend, the performance and music events we had hoped to organise once the pier was ready for us in June.

Also, in our 2011 -2012 business plan, we had included concessions within our income calculations. However, although we returned detailed comments and our approval for at least 6 concessions, we were never given any feedback on CCC’s final choice of only 2 concessions and we certainly didn’t receive any income from them.

So, in the light of our awareness of how little we had been able to deliver on the platform in 2012, a majority of the Board began to see the reciprocal value of a well-run attraction on the platform to increase the footfall to our retail beach hut village we are still intending to build along the leg. Three trustees requested and met – all 6 were invited to attend – David Cain mid-December (after the AGM) to find out more about his proposal and whether he would involve the Trust if CCC decide to go ahead with his proposal. We were not aware that the leasing had not been advertised so that others like Shaney could also apply.

This was our position and how we came to it when I sent out the members’ Christmas Newsletter.

Crazy golf scheme for Herne Bay pier looks set to be approved

Oh dear, it looks like a shoo-in – no surprise there…

A smuggler-themed crazy golf course on Herne Bay pier looks set to be given the go-ahead by planning councillors.

Officials are recommending that the £250,000 scheme by arcade boss David Cain is granted planning permission, despite almost 30 letters from opponents. It would see a 13-hole course, complete with theme-park style shops, caves, waterfalls and bridges, built on the empty pier platform and surrounded by a two-metre high fence.

The development would leave a two-metre wide walkway around the course, giving access to the pier for anglers and walkers. The course would be floodlit and open from 9am to 10pm most of the year.

Two letters supporting the project were sent to Canterbury City Council, pointing out that the site could benefit the whole town and be a unique attraction. They also say it would be different to an existing course, owned by Jonas Pashley, whose family run the Sandancers arcade nearby. His daughter Shaney led the campaign against it and said it could put her father out of business.

Opponents sent a total of 27 letters against the proposals, raising concerns about the impact of the scheme on the regeneration of the pier. Many also argued that there was no need for another crazy golf course.

Planning officer Steve Musk said the main issue was the impact of the development on the seafront conservation area. In a report to the planning committee, who will meet on Tuesday to consider the proposals, he said:

“The proposed development and the use of the site as an adventure-based crazy golf facility would not be out of keeping with the type of activities expected to be found on a seaside pier and would preserve the character of the Herne Bay conservation area.

It is clear that many people do not feel this is an appropriate use for the site, whilst the presence of a crazy golf course nearby has also been a source of concern. It is considered that the impact of the scheme on the locality would be acceptable, [acceptable to whom, Mr Musk?] whilst the proposed use would be in accordance with the Herne Bay Area Action plan which sets out to provide a leisure facility on this site.”

Mr Musk recommends granting planning permission for the scheme, with conditions including that a structural survey on the pier platform is carried out first, and that the course must be removed when it is no longer used.

Mr Cain would still need to negotiate a lease for the site with Canterbury City Council, who own the pier. The council’s ruling executive committee has already agreed that letting out the pier platform could help raise valuable income to pay for maintenance work.

The development control committee will meet at 6.30pm on Tuesday, February 5, at the Guildhall in Canterbury. The meeting is open to the public.

thisiskent 29th Jan 2013

Royal Mail meeting in Whitstable

Hello Herne Bay!

The people of Whitstable want to invite you to a Public Meeting here in Whitstable this Fri (1st Feb 2013) to hear your side of the story since you lost your delivery office to Canterbury.

Royal Mail say the move is successful? I think there are some porky pies being told there.

Come and tell us YOUR side of the story. We will take all your comments directly to Royal Mail as we are fighting hard here to save our own delivery office.

Here’s a short film of last Saturday’s protest here and some information beneath the clip of film. Please pass on this message! There will be a story in your local press this week.

Julie Wassmer

Stands available at Bay business exhibition

Businesses can raise their profile and reach new customers by taking out a stand at this year’s Herne Bay Business and Projects Showcase. The event, organised by the city council, takes place at the King’s Hall on Wednesday 6 March from 2pm to 7pm. It’s the sixth exhibition of its kind and has attracted more than 500 people in previous years.

Stands are just £50 per business, with discounts available for community and voluntary groups. The event will be an excellent way of making new contacts, networking with other businesses and finding out about current and future council and community projects in the town.

In addition this year there is a focus on employment, with partners such as Kent County Council, Job Centre Plus and the National Apprenticeship Service on hand to give advice and guidance on helping people into work.

Organisations already confirmed as attending are HSBC, Quinn Estates, Herne Bay Town Partners and the council’s Local Economy Team. This year’s event is being sponsored by East Kent College and Vattenfall.

The council’s Executive member for Herne Bay regeneration, Cllr Peter Lee, said:

“The business exhibition has now developed into one of the town’s most important events of the year. It’s an opportunity for everyone to get together and celebrate all that’s going on in Herne Bay, learn about future plans and form those business links that can make all the difference in the years ahead.”

To enquire about stand availability at the exhibition, call Paul Spree on 01227 862532 or email paul.spree@canterbury.gov.uk

CCC 25 January 2013

Planning Applications: 25th Jan 2013

2 in Herne Bay

CA//13/00069/FUL: 172-174 Mortimer Street, Herne Bay Change of use of two ground floor retail units to two self-contained one bedroom apartments. Applicant: W H Properties Reason: Conservation area.
CA//13/00071/FUL: 13 South Road, Herne Bay, CT6 5AR Replacement front windows. Applicant: Mrs Willis Reason: Conservation area

CCC Planning Apps 2013-01-25 by HerneBayMatters

http://www.scribd.com/embeds/125825396/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&access_key=key-2bmav4a11u5bqb3oxrx1

Planning Applications: 18th Jan 2013

1 in Herne Bay:

CA//12/02097/FUL: Altira Business Park, Margate Road, Herne Bay, CT6 6LA Erection of a foodstore (Use Class A1) including a cafe, industrial/commercial units (Use Class B1, B2 and/or B8), petrol filling station, surface level car parking, new access and highway works, landscaping, servicing and associated works. Applicant: Terrace Hill (Herne Bay) Limited Reason: Contrary to development plan and major.

CCC Planning Apps 2013-01-18 by HerneBayMatters

http://www.scribd.com/embeds/125825384/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&access_key=key-1qcvlw7k218fxssp258o

Council keen on permanent Westgate scheme

It was confirmed by Kent County Council today (16th January) that the St Dunstan’s and Westgate Towers environmental improvements and traffic management trial will continue for the full year and finish at the end of March. KCC also announced that the road layout will return to its previous configuration at the end of the trial.

The city council will – as it always planned to – assess all the information that has been collected during the 12 months, to take a view on the effectiveness of the scheme. Both councils will then work together, as agreed by the council leaders, to design and implement a permanent scheme later in the year.

Leader of Canterbury City Council, Cllr John Gilbey, said:

“It is fair to say the trial has divided the city and people on both sides of the argument raise many valid points in making their case. But I want to stress that it is our belief that the trial has been the right thing to do and that it should have been given more time for assessment. So we would have liked to have seen the layout remain as it is after March while all the data from the trial is analysed.

This would have been more cost effective and caused the least confusion for motorists, so in these respects today’s news is disappointing. But at least with the trial continuing for the full year, we will have a complete set of data to analyse. We will then spend time assessing the results, including traffic flows, air quality monitoring and all the views we received during the public consultation.

We all know that Canterbury’s traffic problems are complicated but we are committed to working with the county council to tackle these, lower pollution, ease traffic flows and find a permanent solution at the Westgate Towers and in St Dunstan’s.”

CCC 16 January 2013