Canterbury spouts nonsense, Herne Bay fountain of wisdom. Nobody surprised.

#FUCCC Our Council’s Culture & Enterprise bureaucrats seem to think they know what Guardian readers are interested in (how?), but I put it to you, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, that Guardian journalists have a much clearer picture of what interests their readers.

In fact, they’ve already said that they’ll be coming to Herne Bay to cover this summer’s marvellous Duchamp Centenary celebrations… FOR THEIR READERS.

---

Arts festival will bring Guardian journalists to Herne Bay

Guardian readers may not be tempted by the town but the paper’s reporters will be heading to Herne Bay this summer.

Staff from the art and travel section of the national newspaper
are planning to cover the three-week festival dedicated to artist Marcel
Duchamp and his links with the town, amid a storm over an advert that
praised Whitstable and Canterbury but left out Herne Bay.

Tourism chiefs, who paid up to £10,000 for the full-page
feature in the Guardian’s travel section, say they were concentrating on
the brands most likely to attract Guardian readers. But at a meeting organised by the team behind the August
festival, they revealed the paper’s journalists were looking forward to
their visit.

The festival marks 100 years since Duchamp spent a month in Herne Bay, a period believed to be critical to his career. Volunteer Sue Austen, from Bayguide, which is behind the
festival, said it could be a boost to the whole town. Southeastern
trains have agreed to display posters on board. She said:

“It will hopefully encourage people to Herne Bay who have not been before. It will be covered by the Guardian arts section and Guardian
travel section and is already listed in Coast magazine as one of the top
things to do this summer.”

Sue revealed both Kent County Council and Visit Kent had readily
offered support, but said “conversations were ongoing” with Canterbury
City Council, who have so far offered to waive the rent on the Kings
Hall for a one-day conference to discuss the artist’s work.

Steve Coombes, who stood in the KCC elections to raise awareness
of the festival, added:

“Charlotte Higgins is the chief arts writer of
the Guardian and we have been in enthusiastic communication about the
Marcel Duchamp Centenary, by email and phone, since last October. The
same is also true of the Times, Telegraph and BBC arts. Unlike the CCC dept of Culture and Enterprise, they were all thrilled by the idea.”

Members of the Cartoonists’ Club of Great Britain are also
planning to take part, after Ralph Steadman created a one-off design for
a promotional poster. They will create cartoons for toilets, pubs and other places and
there will also be quotes from Duchamp in unusual places around the town
and themed window displays from shops.

David Cross, who will be curating the gallery shows, said:

“We
would like to make it successful to show them that Herne Bay can be –
and has got to be – equal to Whitstable and Canterbury.”

Other events planned include an open exhibition at Beach House
from July 11 and introducing Mr D at Herne Bay Museum from July 16.
Invited artists will show their work at galleries around the town from
July 23 and there will also be an art bike trail.

Children can take part in workshops and add their own designs to
postcards for a pop-up gallery, and live music, street theatre and chess
games are also planned.

Jason Hollingsworth, from Bayguide, said:

“There is a huge
cultural legacy to this. There will be a trail and a plaque on the house
where he stayed in Downs Park.”

For more information on the festival, or to get involved as a volunteer, visit www.iamnotdead.co.uk

Canterbury Times 24th May 2013

Why throw good money at bad airport?

In the hope of finding why KCC are peeing our money away, we’ve asked Sharon Dawson (top banana at Visit Kent) some simple and obvious questions. We’ll let you know what, if anything, comes of them.

---

Dear Ms Dawson,

I understand that Visit Kent has been given £100,000 of public money in order to ‘market’ KLM flights at Manston.  My understanding is that you believe that this money is to enable you to bring visitors into the county as tourists to the county in order to spend money in the county.

I would be grateful if you could answer some questions.

1. What research have KCC or Visit Kent done in terms of revenue brought specifically into a county that has a regional airport? The research I have undertaken shows that regional airports are exporters of tourists to a very significant degree and that even those visitors they do attract  tend to head straight for major tourist centres, most notably London, Edinburgh, Glasgow etc. could you provide me with some concrete evidence that you have that shows significant revenue streams from incoming tourists at comparable regional airports?  I am assuming that such research must be available or such a significant sum of money would not have been committed to a privately owned operation?

2. Exactly how is this money to be spent and where? Given the aim is to attract foreign visitors – which countries/cities/areas are to be targeted and on what basis? I would like confirmation that no money is to be spent advertising outward bound routes given that simply takes money OUT the county. The UK’s tourism deficit is already greater than in any other country so it hardly benefits our ailing economy, both local and national to spend public money on persuading people to spend their money abroad.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Council throws good money at bad airport

KCC + KLM + KIA = WTF

Getting a straight answer out of KCC is hard at the best of times – even with the legal leverage of the Freedom of Information Act it can take months. But it’s usually worth the wait, and the dogged persistence is rewarded. And let’s not forget, anything that’s released under the FoI Act is stuff that they should have told you in the first place. By definition.

A man of Kent, showing the finest British bulldog determination and tenacity set about finding out if there are any hidden deals behind the recently announced KLM-Manston story. Eventually, he managed to prise these three sentences out of them:

I can confirm Kent County Council has not been asked for any contributions from KLM nor have we been asked to fund KLM.

We were however, asked by the owners of Manston airport if we would contribute to a marketing package to market both the route and the opportunities in Kent.

We have agreed a contribution of up to £100,000 subject to approval of a marketing plan and for the monies to be managed by Visit Kent.

Regular readers will remember that KCC and Infratil colluded in a bid to central Government which included a generous £600k sweetener for KLM – effectively “we’ll pay you to use this airport”. They were turned down, quite rightly.

We’ll probably never know whether KLM had put pressure on them to cross their palm with silver, or whether KCC and Infratil are simply very generous (with other people’s money), but it’s depressingly unsurprising to find that they’re at it again.

Everyone knows Infratil is selling Manston airport. More accurately, Infratil is trying to sell Manston airport – it’s been on the market since March 2012, and the asking price seems to be sinking to the same level as airport-free agricultural land. Despite this, they have the balls to ask KCC for money to market and promote the highest profile route they’ve got (even though it isn’t even running yet). KCC, unspeakable idiots that they are, agreed!

For reasons best known to KCC – but I suspect connected to EU competition regulations – they will be “laundering” the money through Visit Kent. So Kent County Council is happy to use public money to market a French/Dutch airline flying from a New Zealand-owned airport. And, yes, this is the same KCC that’s cutting funding to things that people care about.

What makes KCC think this will be money well spent? And what exactly are Visit Kent going to be doing? Good questions, which we have asked on your behalf.